[QS] vs. -GB- 4v4

[Arrow`]

First Game CTF: Win 1-0


Second Game CTF: Win 3-0


Good games

[[QS]~Wolfie|Eternal|Flowie]

Even know I was without a cap, I still returned 2 Lolz.

ggs gb Trey was Traiken, Che was Che, Sep29 was Pimp, Afro was Xatu.

<33

[metra]

good job wolfis

[[SQ]¬qsBAD]

2 caps stolen from cap spec >.> " fu

Nice teamwork overall.


EDIT: SNEAKY KEEP THE $$$$$$$$ COMING. IM YOUNG $$

[Arrow`]

Lies. You jealous of my sexy caps.

[[QS]_ShaDo]

scrims like these make me wanna become a bum and get active again -_0


nice teamwork qew ess!

[exception]

Oct 1, 2011 19:03:52 GMT -5 [SQ]¬qsBAD said:

2 caps stolen from cap spec >.> " fu

Nice teamwork overall.


EDIT: SNEAKY KEEP THE $$$$$$$$ COMING. IM YOUNG $$

Its meant to be a kw for the $$$ and i c know agreement

[[SQ]¬qsBAD]

Oct 2, 2011 5:05:01 GMT -5 exception said:

Oct 1, 2011 19:03:52 GMT -5 [SQ]¬qsBAD said:

2 caps stolen from cap spec >.> " fu

Nice teamwork overall.


EDIT: SNEAKY KEEP THE $$$$$$$$ COMING. IM YOUNG $$

Its meant to be a kw for the $$$ and i c know agreement

Basically, point of kw is to use tags and real GB/QS players to win the matches. So doesn't matter if there's agreement or not. It still against GB vs QS...what difference would KW would've made anyways?

[[QS]_stealth]

Oct 2, 2011 11:38:27 GMT -5 [SQ]¬qsBAD said:

Oct 2, 2011 5:05:01 GMT -5 exception said:

Its meant to be a kw for the $$$ and i c know agreement

Basically, point of kw is to use tags and real GB/QS players to win the matches. So doesn't matter if there's agreement or not. It still against GB vs QS...what difference would KW would've made anyways?

Its when both sides play their BEST! ;D


If your point of a kw was true, I'm sure gb and r3 will have tons of moving to do.

Thinking of it, do you know how many times you guys lost to r3 & gb with both sides wearing tags? 1, 2 skip a few..holy shit!

[[QS] ¥¬ Censor~]

Oct 2, 2011 5:05:01 GMT -5 exception said:

Oct 1, 2011 19:03:52 GMT -5 [SQ]¬qsBAD said:

2 caps stolen from cap spec >.> " fu

Nice teamwork overall.


EDIT: SNEAKY KEEP THE $$$$$$$$ COMING. IM YOUNG $$

Its meant to be a kw for the $$$ and i c know agreement

8===================================================================D~~~~~~~ O:

[[SQ]¬qsBAD]

Oct 2, 2011 13:14:51 GMT -5 [QS]_stealth said:

Oct 2, 2011 11:38:27 GMT -5 [SQ]¬qsBAD said:

Basically, point of kw is to use tags and real GB/QS players to win the matches. So doesn't matter if there's agreement or not. It still against GB vs QS...what difference would KW would've made anyways?

Its when both sides play their BEST! ;D


If your point of a kw was true, I'm sure gb and r3 will have tons of moving to do.

Thinking of it, do you know how many times you guys lost to r3 & gb with both sides wearing tags? 1, 2 skip a few..holy shit!

So if it's not a KW, what GB especially, thinks is that "Hey guys, it's not a KW we will lose!" scrim and kw is just an excuse for trying. Scrim is just where 2 players from different clans or players without a clan play but KW is a match against legit members from both teams and I think that's what it really was.

All the rules of a KW were applied in this match except an agreement OH MY GOSH NO AGREEMENT.

[[QS]~Wolfie|Eternal|Flowie]

ye its true all that wus missing was an agreement and even if their was an agreement we won both ctfs so a ts would be for no reason.